Visual assessment of diffusion weighted imaging infarct volume lacks accuracy and reliability - Université de Franche-Comté Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery Année : 2019

Visual assessment of diffusion weighted imaging infarct volume lacks accuracy and reliability

Naim Khoury
  • Fonction : Auteur
Cyril Dargazanli
Adrien Guenego
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kevin Zuber
Asya Ekmen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Solène Hebert
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean Capron
  • Fonction : Auteur
Candice Sabben
  • Fonction : Auteur
Erwan Morvan
  • Fonction : Auteur
William Boisseau
  • Fonction : Auteur
Benjamin Maier
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kévin Premat
  • Fonction : Auteur
Frédéric Clarençon
  • Fonction : Auteur
Stanislas Smajda
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hocine Redjem
Vanessa Chalumeau
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gregoire Boulouis
Annaëlle Chetrit
  • Fonction : Auteur
Augustin Lecler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Patricia Koskas
  • Fonction : Auteur
Loic Duron
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gabriele Ciccio
Célina Ducroux
  • Fonction : Auteur
Simon Escalard
Jean Philippe Desilles
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mylène Hamdani
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bertrand Lapergue
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mikael Mazighi
Malek Ben Maacha
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nahida Brikci-Nigassa
  • Fonction : Auteur
Raphael Blanc
Michel Piotin
Robert Fahed

Résumé

Purpose The DAWN trial (Diffusion weighted imaging or CT perfusion Assessment with clinical mismatch in the triage of Wake-up and late presenting strokes undergoing Neurointervention with Trevo) has demonstrated the benefits of thrombectomy in patients with unknown or late onset strokes, using automated software (RAPID) for measurement of infarct volume. Because RAPID is not available in all centers, we aimed to assess the accuracy and repeatability of visual infarct volume estimation by clinicians and the consequences for thrombectomy decisions based on the DAWN criteria. Materials and methods 18 physicians, who routinely depend on MRI for acute stroke imaging, assessed 32 MR scans selected from a prospective databaseover two independent sessions. Raters were asked to visually estimate the diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) infarct volume for each case. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the estimated volumes were compared with the available RAPID measurements for various volume cut-off points. Thrombectomy decisions based on DAWN criteria with RAPID measurements and raters’ visual estimates were compared. Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was measured using kappa statistics. Results The mean accuracy of raters was <90% for all volume cut-points. Inter-rater agreement was below substantial for each DWI infarct volume cut-off points. Intra-rater agreement was substantial for 55–83% of raters, depending on the selected cut-off points. Applying DAWN criteria with visual estimates instead of RAPID measurements led to 19% erroneous thrombectomy decisions, and showed a lack of reproducibility. Conclusion The visual assessment of DWI infarct volume lacks accuracy and repeatability, and could lead to a significant number of erroneous decisions when applying the DAWN criteria.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-03654623 , version 1 (28-04-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Naim Khoury, Cyril Dargazanli, Adrien Guenego, Kevin Zuber, Asya Ekmen, et al.. Visual assessment of diffusion weighted imaging infarct volume lacks accuracy and reliability. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 2019, 11 (9), pp.947-954. ⟨10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014613⟩. ⟨hal-03654623⟩

Collections

UNIV-FCOMTE
10 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More